NVCA Video and a Happy Birthday!

First, Happy Birthday to the National Venture Capital Association! May it have another successful 35 years!

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that I am part of the Venture Capital industry. In fact, I devote nearly 100 percent of my work time to forming, guiding and counseling Venture Capital Funds. Nevertheless, I can’t blame readers for not connecting the dots — there has been a pretty strict wall between work life and blog life.

This “acting stint” for the NVCA falls pretty close to mid-way between those two lives — so I will stretch (slightly) to share the video here with you today. It will be shared with members of Congress as part of a lobbying effort to refocus support for the Venture Capital ecosystem. To that goal, I wish the NVCA all the best success.

I show up at the 4:00 mark in case you are only interested in laughing at me. Enjoy!



Rumi on Radical Acceptance

Here is a bit of Rumi for your Monday (via my lovely wife — thanks Paula for the patience and the help).

This being human is a guest house.
Every morning a new arrival.

A joy, a depression, a meanness,
some momentary awareness comes
as an unexpected visitor.

Welcome and entertain them all
Even if they’re a crowd of sorrows,
who violently sweep your house
empty of its furniture.

Still treat each guest honorably,
He may be clearing you out
for some new delight.

The dark thought, the shame, the malice,
meet them at the door laughing,
and invite them in.

Be grateful for whoever comes,
because each has been sent
as a guide from beyond.



The Post American World

At the recommendation of Fred Wilson over at Union Square Ventures, today I began reading (well, actually, listening via Audible to) The Post American World by Fareed Zakaria.

I am only about an hour into the book, but I must say that it is a fascinating read.  Certainly, there is nothing surprising here, however, the book is bringing its thesis out of the nagging corners of my mind and into the daylight of front-and-center conscious thought.

I also agree that the following picture — which spurred Fred’s read of the book — provides a fresh ray of hope.  I believe that this book can help us (and apparently those that could lead us) see ourselves and our country on the world stage in a new context — in a context of what’s coming, rather than in a context of what has been.

As I approach the remaining 7 hours of this book, my hope and curiosity is sparked afresh.



Do Schools Kill Creativity?

For those of you that know my family, you likely know that our oldest daughter Malena will, this coming Fall, begin a Waldorf program for Kindergarten. We are very excited.

There are many reasons why Waldorf seems to be a good fit for us and Malena. One of those reasons is that Paula and I do not consider ourselves overly creative. Paula and I are both very structured people (in our own way). Malena, in contrast, is an extremely sensitive, empathetic, and creative person. Consequently, we wanted to find a setting that could foster and nurture those qualities and we hope Waldorf is that setting.

And all of that is a long introduction to a topic for which I am unable to fully articulate my as-yet-not-fully-formed views — and that is the topic of our public, and to a lesser extent, mainstream-private, school systems. For a long time now, I have a had a nagging unease brewing in the back of my mind regarding our choices for the school(s) which will educate our children. When I watched Sir Ken Robinson’s TED talk from 2006, it clicked…”yeah, that’s it…that’s what I have been concerned about.”

So, without further adieu (there has been too much “adieu” in this post already), I present you with another outstanding TED Talk and ask you…What do you think? Do schools really kill creativity?



Eat Food, Not Too Much, Mostly Plants

“Eat Food, Not Too Much, Mostly Plants” is the advice that adorns the cover, and is the call to arms, of Michael Pollan’s newest book, In Defense of Food.

This is a marvelous book that, as the author asserts in his lecture at Google, really does go a long way toward offering a solution to the dilemma presented in his prior book The Omnivore’s Dilemma.  And his proposed solution is…drum roll please…contained in those 7 words adorning the cover.

What this book does NOT do:

*  It does not point toward wonderful or evil nutrients that should be either sought (through supplements or industrial fortification) or shunned (through abstinence or regulation).  On this topic, the book instead points out the flaws of that kind of “parking lot” food science.

*  It does NOT trumpet some new scientific advancement or wonder-drug or wonder-diet.  On this topic, it instead points out the inconsistent/contradictory history of such practices — from the Protein is bad for you and carbohydrates are good for you faze that ushered in breakfast cereal as the “healthier alternative to bacon and eggs” to just a nearly opposite recent trend (embodied in part by the Atkins Diet).

What this book DOES do:

*  It implores readers to seek to eat the way their grandmothers or great-grandmothers ate.

*  It implores readers to focus on food systems rather than food additives or ingredients.

*  It implores readers to focus on eating as an end in and of itself rather than merely a means to an end.

I could go on and on about obese, diabetic westernized Aborigines that cured their ills merely by returning to the bush (and a traditional diet).  I could go on and on about how red meat is not a problem, but how feed-lot red meat is a problem — and how the problem can be solved by eating range-fed, grass-fed beef / chickens / eggs rather than their “conventional” or even “industrial organic” cousins.  I could go on and on about how the French Paradox may be less about the red wine (although we are still learning about how beneficial small quantities of red wine can be) and more about HOW the French eat (no snacking, no eating in cars, no eating alone).

On a great many subjects explored in this fascinating book…I could go on…and on.

But I won’t.

I will instead encourage you to “eat food, not too much, mostly plants” and to read the book.